Thoughts on Medical Banking
This past week, I was in Nashville attending the Medical Banking Project's Leadership Forum, which was hosted by the Vanderbilt University Center for Better Health. The Medical Banking Project is a think-tank whose goal is to raise awareness of how banks and healthcare can intersect and drive increased efficiency, visibility, etc. The goal of the forum was to choose a few projects where the members could work together to pilot some use-case concepts that would demonstrate how these two very different industries could work together.
When people hear the term "medical banking" they're often confused, and that confusion doesn't improve much even among the medical banking project members. With such a broad scope and so many different vendors and other organizations involved, everyone's definition seemed to be different.
To pare things down, here's a few points that most members would agree with:
- Banks specialize in well defined discrete transaction processing coupled with high visibility.
- Healthcare organizations specialize in complex decision making that often requires the distillation of large amount of data into generalized care protocols that are often adjusted based on specific peculiarities.
- Financial organizations are not very well equipped to deal with "creative" or "non-standard" processes or products. When your only tool for evaluation is a balance sheet, context gets lost very quickly.
- Healthcare organizations face a really large challenge distilling down their very fluid, complex, customizable environment into financial transactions, and as a result, are really bad at providing visibility to anyone involved in the healthcare spectrum (patients, providers, payors, regulators, etc.).
- Trends suggest that patients will become more responsible for costs out of pocket, and combined with rising expectations of online access and visibility, will begin demanding more from healthcare providers.