High Speed Passenger Rail for America: Thanks But No Thanks
Most of you know that I really like trains. Model railroading is a hobby of mine, and I grew up consistently riding trains in China as alternative transport options either didn't exist or were really unsafe (read: 80's era Chinese airlines). We generally travel by train in Europe when we visit. However, most people are usually surprised that I don't support any plans for high speed rail in the US and don't envy the extensive passenger networks that exist overseas.
Passenger service requires the presence of several factors which are almost never available in the United States:
- Relatively short distances (less than 4 hours).
- High population density.
- Good local public transport one you've reached your destination.
- High schedule density (a lot of trains providing lots of schedule options).
“In China, we will have a debt crisis — a high-speed rail debt crisis,” he said. “I think it is more serious than your subprime mortgage crisis. You can always leave a house or use it. The rail system is there. It’s a burden. You must operate the rail system, and when you operate it, the cost is very high.”I'd rather have the railroad system the US currently has, thank you very much. A privately funded, operated, and most importantly, wildly efficient transportation system that's designed to move big bulky stuff. As gas prices fluctuate and we continue to import a huge percentage of our manufactured goods, we're sitting pretty.